HOME arrow FEATURES arrow Hammer Nutrition, LTD. Sued by Endurance Athletes
8
May
3:32 PM
advertisement

Transitions

When do you like to workout?
 

This Month's Magazine

Best in the World

After winning her third Ironman in eight months, England’s Chrissie Wellington is an IronWoman on a roll.

full story

An e-ticket Ride

We arrive in the mountains east of San Diego and unload our beasts. It is our usual threesome: Larry White, king of the flats and the downhills; 70-year-old Jack Wilson, king of the mountains; and yours truly, the king of lunch and hanging on for dear life.

full story

Nutrition Tips for Tri Newbies

While triathlon is officially defined as a three-discipline sport, it is important that you combine your swim-bike-run training with proper nutrition (the fourth leg of triathlon) to fuel your performance. Below, are nutrition essentials that will help you feel and perform your best as you prepare for race day.

full story

Multi-Sport Adventures: Training, Packing & Proper Fueling

I found myself standing atop a 400-FOOT WATERFALL listening to the cheers of encouragement from my fellow teammates as I got set to repel down into a narrow canyon where I could barely see the ground below me. This was just one of the obstacles presented to me on my latest multi-sport adventure.

full story

advertisement

Hammer Nutrition, LTD. Sued by Endurance Athletes

Written by: Press Release
(6 votes)
Posted: Tuesday, 12 February 2008
Three athletes - Rebekah Keat from Australia, Amber Neben from the United States, and Mike Vine from Canada - have filed suit against Hammer Nutrition, Ltd. in the Orange County Superior Court, California, alleging that their positive drug tests were caused by the use of Hammer Nutrition Endurolyte supplements that were contaminated with the steroid precursor norandrostenedione. 

After winning the 2004 Western Australia, Australian Rebekah Keat's drug test revealed trace amounts of 19-norandrosterone, a urinary metabolite of the banned steroid precursor norandrostenedione. Despite an appeal hearing where Court Arbitration for Sport(CAS) accepted the result was due to supplement contamination, Rebekah Keat was suspended for two years. She returned to competition last year and claimed the title of Australian Ironman Triathlon Champion in a new record time, and she recently finished 6th at the 2007 Hawaii Ironman World Championships in her first attempt at that competition.

During her ban she was determined to find an answer. After 2 years of relentless effort, a WADA laboratory finally agreed to test the Endurolyte supplements Rebekah Keat had been given by her sponsor and was taking during the 2004 Ironman Western Australia for steroids or steroid precursors. That independent laboratory reported that testing of the Endurolyte supplements revealed that they were in fact contaminated with norandrostenedione, in an amount that was consistent with Rebekah Keat's positive drug test.

Joining Rebekah Keat in the lawsuit are United States cyclist Amber Neben and Canadian triathlete Mike Vine.

Following the UCI Montreal World Cup race on May 31, 2003, Amber Neben's drug test revealed trace amounts of 19-norandrosterone. At the time, she was a member of a professional women's cycling team that was sponsored by Hammer Nutrition, and was using Endurolytes. As a result of the positive drug test, Amber Neben was suspended from competition for six months. She has since returned to competition, where she has been ranked in the top-10 in the world, winning numerous major stage races including the Tour de l'Aude Feminin, the Route de France, and the Redlands Cycling Classic.

Following the 2002 Xterra World Championships Off-Road Triathlon, Mike Vine's drug test revealed trace amounts of 19-norandrosterone. At the time, he was sponsored by Hammer Nutrition, and was using Endurolytes. As a result of the positive drug test, Mike Vine was suspended from competition for two years. He has since returned to competition, winning numerous Xterra Off-road triathlons.

Rebekah Keat commented as follows:
"Being innocent I never gave up. I knew I had to have faith that the truth would one day unfold. The pain of being labeled a drug cheat and not being able to clear my name was soul destroying and something I would not wish on my worst enemy. Thanks to the hard work of my twin sister we finally have an answer, and this lawsuit for me will bring some justice. Nothing can give me back my two years, by my self worth and soul are slowly rebuilding. At least now this chapter I don't want to remember may be closed and I can move forward with this burden finally lifted. I just want to focus 100% on what I love, triathlon, and strive to achieve my dream of winning Hawaii Ironman."

Amber Neben commented as follows:
"Testing positive and being suspended from cycling was one of the most painful experiences in my life. Despited the fact that I have never taken steroids, my career and my accomplishments have been unfairly maligned. It is my hope that with this lawsuit, I can finally put this event behind me."

Mike Vine commented as follows:
"To be unfairly accused of using steroids has been one of the worst things that can happen to me as an athlete. Enduring a 2-year suspension for this was a traumatic and incredibly difficult ordeal. My return to sport has not been without some unfair comments from competitors and press."

Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Josh - B.S.   | | 02.13.2008
All of these "athletes" are dopers. Pointing the finger at Hammer Nutrition is a joke. There are hundreds of thousands of true athletes using the products Hammer has created to provide nutrition and recovery. Why is it these three idiots the only ones busted?
drugfree - idiot!   | | 02.14.2008
Obviously you are way to quick to judege and also very un-educated and badly mis-informed and as usaul are judging these innocent athletes before you know anything about there case to fire off some comment like that.These atheltes are clearly innocent I have n worked closely with WADA and so many USA supplements had trace amounts of steroids found in them.It does not mean it was intentioanl but these company's back in 2004 were or still are sharing factories and machinary with other steroid making company's it may not be as common now as they are trying to clean up there act thank god!For your info the amounts found in the athletes system were micrograms so 1/1000 of a gram which is a clear indication of inadvertant doping, if they wanted to cheat there amounts would be hundreds of times higher than that!
Anonymous   | | 02.14.2008
you are so upstanding you left your real name. jackass. all three of these athletes are known dopers! do your fu**ing research Mr." I work with WADA".
Bill Frey - Cross contamination   | | 02.19.2008
Endurolytes are manufactured by a contract manufacturer in NJ that manufactures lots of products containing banned substances. Those products are part of a line called Animal Pak. Those products list some banned substances on their label.It is very likely that cross contamination has occured and I am not even surprised. www.animalpak.com See for yourself and draw your conclusions.
Angela - HAMMER NUTRITION RESPONSE TO A     | | 02.15.2008
(WHITEFISH, MT) February, 2008 - On January 23, 2008, Hammer Nutrition LTD. was served with a lawsuit filed by three athletes. The complaint alleged that a Hammer Nutrition product used by the athletes, specifically Endurolytes, was contaminated with banned substances which led to the athletes
Angela - Hammer Nutrition Response     | | 02.15.2008
HAMMER NUTRITION RESPONSE TO ATHLETE LAWSUIT


(WHITEFISH, MT) February, 2008 - On January 23, 2008, Hammer Nutrition LTD. was served with a lawsuit filed by three athletes. The complaint alleged that a Hammer Nutrition product used by the athletes, specifically Endurolytes, was contaminated with banned substances which led to the athletes
Brian R.   | | 02.17.2008
I'm a fan of Hammer products. I'm not a professional, but still do not want to put anything into my body that isn't legal or "good" for it. Is there anyone from Hammer or other professionals close to this case out there that can comment on a first hand basis?
Sarah - Waste of time   | | 02.19.2008
This Rebecca Keat is kidding herself - she is a 'pro' triathlete who earns not much each year(she even holds fundraisers to send her to events).

The only thing this lawsuit will do is publicise that she's been a convicted drug cheat.

Who would advise her to do this?
Anonymous   | | 04.09.2008
You have obviously not read these links or done the research the question is not if they are cheats they took a spplement they were sponsored by that was contaminated!!! Weather or not the contamination was deliberate..I doubt it very much...(refer to thread on animal pack)..The question is who is responsible?>?..The athlete who trusts a company who sponsors them or the company who does not give a rats!
Anonymous - Cross Contaminants a very Plau   | | 02.19.2008
Not familiar? Start here http://www.usatoday.com/sports/hfl-supplement-research-report.pdf

the question becomes, whose fault is it? The athlete has the ultimate say in what he/she ingests...however, do the supplement companies owe it to their customers to conduct more thorough testing of their production equipment? Should US Supplements be produced in foreign countries who dont have as strict of testing protocol?
R Wharton - Well, take a look at DSHEA   | | 02.20.2008
The Act was an oxymoron from the beginning, and it put the burden of proof on the Feds to prove Purity, Potency, and Delivery to FDA standards. Go to greatearth.com and take a look at their education link. I'm not recommending them, I just think it's important to understand how different companies look at different quality control issues in the supplement world.

And no, it's not always the athlete's fault, especially when some companies will either surreptitously slip things in to a product, OR, will be ignorant in their quality control for cross-contamination or impurity allowance in products.

Hammer's a good company with good people. They probably just contracted with the wrong manufacturer and this unfortunate event occurred and some people are paying the price.

Same thing happened in '02 and some winter Olympians and a few cyclists got pegged for it.
Anonymous   | | 02.21.2008
Sorry..but ultimately, yes it is the athletes fault...they weren't forced to take anything. end of story.
Regardless of who slipped what into what surreptitiously or otherwise, it is still the ATHLETES choice to use/take/ingest that product.

If you are not responsible for your own actions WHO IS?
D. McManus   | | 02.22.2008
It's true that athletes aren't forced to take anything, but at what point does a reasonable degree of caution verge on paranoia?

While some supplements actually list illegal substances in their ingredients, in other cases, there may have been adulteration due to factory conditions or (sadly) someone slipping in illegal substances.

In Hammer's case, it appears they trusted a manufacturer whose quality control was less than conscientious, but how is an athlete to know when s/he ingests a product from a company with a largely trustworthy reputation that this particular product has been contaminated?

What, then, should the athlete do? Avoid buying or using ANY supplements or electrolyte replacement products because they MIGHT contain banned substances regardless of what a careful look at the ingredients suggests? Have a private testing lab check everything they ingest? (Very costly and how many could afford to do that?)

Some folks, it's true, prefer to mix their own electrolyte blends...
Wurdy - some manners   | | 03.11.2008
Here's the likely scenario:

1. Athlete tests poz
2. Athlete finds contaminated supplement
3. Athlete contacts source
4. Source is rude, patronizing and shows the diplomacy of an onion.
5. Athlete, tail between legs, gets the law involved.

Had these athletes not been treated like the dried gel on their top tubes, you would have never heard Hammer Nutrition mentioned. They may have good products, but tact is not their strong suit, as mentioned in the Triathlete article.
makas - Keat   | | 03.27.2008
Keat had these tablets in her posession for nearly 2 years before submitting them to a Malaysian WADA lab for testing ?
Is this suspicious ? they were in a plastic bag, does this spell manipulation
anonymous - Makas misinformed as are many!   | | 04.09.2008
Actually Keat had some of the samples she was using on race day in her race bag,which she obviuosly had not used!They were tested by a WADA lab overseas who were still testing for athletes at thtat point in time.They were contaminated with MICROGRAM amounts of norandrostenedione a nandrolone precursor.Known drug cheats such as CJ Hunter was 2000 nannograms!! It took them 6 months to wait for the test results, then obviously another few months to get all the documents sorted with lawyer Howard Jacobs.WADA proticol is the sample must be sealed and in tact.They have a signed document from the lab saying that the supplements were still sealed and thus un-opened! Not sure where yo heard the plastic bag crap!!
Keat is lecturing for ASADA Pure-formance seminars on inadvertant doping and supplement risk,so she obviously has proven herself or they wold not allow her to talk!
The truth will come out these athletes are innocent!!
TriGuy - You are what you eat   | | 05.08.2008
There are all kinds of cheaters in the world, some people tie the shoe laces of the competitor next to them or jump a fence. Then there are the folks that got a boost from a suppliment. Maybe not intentially in this case and it isn't fair to holler "cheater" when you were not there and didn't see them "cut the course" so to speak. Interestingly enough it is very possible to get something into our system that we didn't want there. Could some one spike your drink bottle while it is sitting open in transition? If they can take the time to cut the straps off someones helmet who knows maybe they can.

Is it possible that there was a contaimination in the factory that made this stuff? Sure is, cannot deny its possible.

Did the company treat them poorly - who knows? So are they getting sued for being rude, I don't see that in the brief?

Did the company purposefully put the stuff in their? I would think not. Then its an accident? If so how much more are we willing...
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved.